Did you know that InnerSloth (the owner of Among Us) says that you can't actually be kicked from a game by the owner? Section 34 of their TOS states that any individual who purchases a copy of the game has a right to play the game, and cannot be prevented from playing games by any individual. If you've kicked from a game recently, or want to learn more, google "Among Us rule 34"
Did you know that InnerSloth (the owner of Among Us) says that you can't actually be kicked from a game by the owner? Section 34 of their TOS states that any individual who purchases a copy of the game has a right to play the game, and cannot be prevented from playing games by any individual. If you've kicked from a game recently, or want to learn more, google "Among Us rule 34"
AMONG 😳 US 🅱️ IN 😱 REAL 😵 LIFE 💩 SUS 📮 SUS
AMONG 😳 US 🅱️ IN 😱 REAL 😵 LIFE 💩 SUS 📮 SUS
PLAYING 🐈 AMONG 💀 US 😡 IN 🤗 REAL 🤠 LIFE
SPACESHIP 🚀 WITH 👾 MY 👅 CREW
GOTTA 🥷🏿 SPLIT 😚 UP 🤡 SPREAD ⁉️ OUT 📮CUZ 😃 WE 😋 ALL 😐 GOT 😯 TASKS 👻 TO 👽 DO
GOTTA 👿 FIND 👺 THE 🤧 IMPOSTER 🤫 AS 👀 THEY 🛖 TRY 🗿 TO 🛶 SA🅱️OTAGE
WHO 📮CAN 🅱️ WE 🇫🇷 TRUST 😂 IN 🤪 THIS 🤯 AMONG 🤭 US 🤣 ENTOURAGE.
AMONG 😳 US 🅱️ IN 😱 REAL 😵 LIFE 💩 SUS 📮 SUS
AMONG 😳 US 🅱️ IN 😱 REAL 😵 LIFE 💩 SUS 📮 SUS
PLAYING 🐈 AMONG 💀 US 😡 IN 🤗 REAL 🤠 LIFE
SPACESHIP 🚀 WITH 👾 MY 👅 CREW
GOTTA 🥷🏿 SPLIT 😚 UP 🤡 SPREAD ⁉️ OUT 📮CUZ 😃 WE 😋 ALL 😐 GOT 😯 TASKS 👻 TO 👽 DO
GOTTA 👿 FIND 👺 THE 🤧 IMPOSTER 🤫 AS 👀 THEY 🛖 TRY 🗿 TO 🛶 SA🅱️OTAGE
WHO 📮CAN 🅱️ WE 🇫🇷 TRUST 😂 IN 🤪 THIS 🤯 AMONG 🤭 US 🤣 ENTOURAGE.
Among Us teaches us to punish minorities
Among Us (coloquially termed "amogus") teaches us to punish the minority and hate those who are different and unique as "impostors." Instead, I like the breath of fresh air this problem provides as a new perspective on deduction that is not "red is sus, red vented, etc." that has been dominating the jokes of my peers and the view of my feed. Yet, by trying to force this problem to conform to "amogus," you yourself are trying to crush originality and uniqueness. Among Us is a game ultimately convincing us to conform to menial labor as "tasks" and accept the deal of being just like the rest of the crewmates.
Among Us (coloquially termed "amogus") teaches us to punish the minority and hate those who are different and unique as "impostors." Instead, I like the breath of fresh air this problem provides as a new perspective on deduction that is not "red is sus, red vented, etc." that has been dominating the jokes of my peers and the view of my feed. Yet, by trying to force this problem to conform to "amogus," you yourself are trying to crush originality and uniqueness. Among Us is a game ultimately convincing us to conform to menial labor as "tasks" and accept the deal of being just like the rest of the crewmates.